Gender and Security in International Relations: Understanding Narrative Approach to Security

Sanjukta Nath

doi:10.48001/veethika.2024.10.02.005

Authors

Sanjukta Nath Assistant Professor, University School of Liberal Arts, GGSIPU, Delhi https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9587-1110

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48001/veethika.2024.10.02.005

Keywords:

Security, International relations, gender, militarisation, Narrative approach

Abstract

The article critically analyses the concept of security in the discipline of International Relations. With the focus on war and states, the idea of security has become oblivious of how force and organised violence along with security policies affect bodies. With the aim to demystify certain foundational assumption of the security discourse, the article uses gender as a categorical variable while analysing security. By applying gender lens to the idea of security, it tries to understand the growing militarisation of security in the discourse of security. The article proposes that a gender lens be used to understand and evaluate the security policies so that the comprehensive impact of ‘security policies’ on ‘bodies’ (individuals) can be comprehensively understood. In this context, the article notes importance of ‘a narrative approach to security’ to have a more comprehensive understanding of the implications of security policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baldwin, David A. (1993), “Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics”, in David A. Baldwin (ed.) Neorealism and Neoliberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.

Blanchard, Eric. M. (2003), “Gender, International Relations and the Development of Feminist Security Theory”, Chicago Journal, 28 (4): 1289-1312.

Butler, Judith (1993), Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex, New York: Routledge.

Buzan, Barry (1983), People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post- Cold War Era, Sussex: Wheatsheaf Books Ltd.

Buzan, Barry and Lene Hansen (2009), “The Cold War Challenges to National Security”, in Buzan, Barry and Lene Hansen (eds.), The Evolution of International Security Studies, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Campbell, D. (1998), Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Detraz, Nicole (2012), International Security and Gender, Cambridge: Polity Press.

Dillon, G. M. (1990), “The Alliance of Security and Subjectivity”, Current Research on Peace and Violence, 13 (3): 101-24.

Eichler, Maya (2014), “Militarised Masculinities in International Relations”, Brown Journal of World Affairs, 21 (1): 81-93.

Freedman, L. (1998), “Military power and political influence”, International Affairs, 74(4), 763-780.

Hooper, Charlotte (2001), Manly States: Masculinities, International Relations and Gender Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.

Huysmans, J. (1998), “Security! What do you mean? From Concept to Thick Signifier”, European Journal of International Relations, 4 (2): 226-255.

Morgenthau, Hans J., (1978) Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Polkinghorne, D. (1999), Narrative Knowing and the Human Sciences, Albany: State University of New York Press.

Tickner, J. Ann (2001), Gendering World Politics: Issues and Approaches in the Post-Cold War Era, New York: Columbia University Press.

Tilly, Charles (1985), “War Making and State Making as Organised Crime”, in Peter Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol (eds), Bringing the State Back, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ullman, Richard H. (1983), “Redefining Security”, International Security 8 (1): 129-153

*UN Security Council (2000), UN Security Council Resolution 1325, S/RES/1325, annex.

Waltz, Kenneth (1959), Man, the State and War: A Theoretical Analysis, New York: Columbia University Press.

Waltz, Kenneth (1979), Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.

Walt, Stephen M. (1991), “The Renaissance of Security Studies”, International Studies Quarterly, 35 (2): 211-239.

Wæver, Ole, et al. (1993), Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe, London: Pinter.

Wæver, Ole (1995), “Securitisation and De-Securitisation”, in Ronnie D. Lipschutz (ed.) On Security, Columbia: Columbia University Press.

Wendt, Alexander (1992), “Anarchy is what States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics”, International Organisation, 46 (2): 391-425.

Whitworth, Sandra (2008) “The Ethics of Feminism”, in Christian Reus-Smit and Duncan Snidal (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Relation, New York: Oxford University Press.

Wibben, Annick T.R. (2011), Feminist Security Studies- A Narrative Approach, New York: Routledge.

Williams, Michael (1998), “Modernity, Identity, and Security: a Comment on the Copenhagen Controversy”, Review of International Studies, 24 (3): 435-439.

Young, Iris Marion (2003), “Logic of Masculinist Protection”, Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 29 (1): 1-25