Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes - 2018: A Critical Review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48001/veethika.1004008

Keywords:

Victim Compensation, Sexual Assault, Heteronormative, Hegemonic masculinity

Abstract

The Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault and Other Crimes (2018) was developed to provide financial assistance to victims of sexual violence in India. The scheme was initiated under the directive of the Supreme Court and intended to address the needs of survivors by offering structured compensation based on the severity of the crime. However, this review critically analyzes its limitations, including its hierarchical approach to victim compensation, which prioritizes gang rape over other forms of sexual assault and undervalues other trauma-inducing experiences, such as severe physical disabilities. The scheme also demonstrates inconsistencies in its treatment of minors under the POCSO Act, ignoring the continuum of violence and its impact on children across age groups. Furthermore, its exclusive focus on female victims neglects male survivors, reinforcing a heteronormative framework that fails to account for the diversity of victim experiences. This approach perpetuates societal biases and undermines the scheme’s ability to provide equitable support. Reforms to the scheme are necessary to address these gaps and ensure inclusivity, reflecting the spectrum of trauma across all genders, ages, and forms of violence. By adopting a trauma-informed and survivor-centric framework, the scheme can better meet its objective of delivering justice to all victims.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Authority, N. L. S. (2018). Compensation scheme for women victims/survivors of sexual assault/other crimes – 2018. Retrieved from [https://kslsa.kar.nic.in/pdfs/guidelines/NALSAs_Compensation_Scheme_for_Women_Victims-2018.pdf]

Boyle, K. (2019). What’s in a name? Theorising the inter-relationships of gender and violence. Feminist Theory, 20(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700118754957

Brouwer, A.-M. D. (2007). Reparation to victims of sexual violence: Possibilities at the international criminal court and at the trust fund for victims and their families. Cambridge University Press.

Human Rights Commission for Child Rights. (2021, May). Compensation for child victims of sexual offences in India: Examining the implementation of POCSO and victim compensation schemes. Retrieved from [https://haqcrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/implementation-of-the-pocso-act-delhi-mumbai-study-final.pdf]

Freeman Jr, D. H., & Temple, J. R. (2010). Social factors associated with history of sexual assault among ethnically diverse adolescents. Journal of Family Violence, 25(3), 349–356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-009-9296-6

Henry, N. (2016). Theorising wartime rape: Deconstructing gender, sexuality, and violence. Gender and Society, 30(1), 44–56. Retrieved from [https://www.jstor.org/stable/24756163](https://www.jstor.org/stable/24756163)

Hunnicutt, G. (2009). Varieties of patriarchy and violence against women: Resurrecting ‘patriarchy’ as a theoretical tool. Violence Against Women, 15(5), 553–573. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801208331246

Kelly, L. (1988). Surviving sexual violence. University of Minnesota Press.

Kirchengast, T. (2016). Compensation and victim assistance. In Victims and the criminal trial. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51000-6_7

Koss, M. P. (2000). Blame, shame, and community: Justice responses to violence against women. American Psychologist, 55(11), 1332–1343. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1332

Russell, Y. (2014). Thinking sexual difference through the law of rape [Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Thesis]. University of Kent.

Sinduja, S. (2021). Legal reforms addressing sexual harassment in India: Examining the role of women’s dress as a contributing factor. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research (IJFMR).

Stemple, L., & Meyer, I. H. (2016). The sexual victimization of men in America: New data challenge old assumptions. American Journal of Public Health, 104(6), e19–e26. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.301946

Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (2000). Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: Findings from the national violence against women survey (Tech. Rep.). Office of Justice Programs, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Retrieved from [https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181867](https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/181867)

Weis, K., & Borges, S. S. (1973). Victimology and rape: The case of the legitimate victim. Issues in Criminology, 8(2), 71–115.

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Ghosh, S. (2024). Compensation Scheme for Women Victims/Survivors of Sexual Assault/other Crimes - 2018: A Critical Review. VEETHIKA-An International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 10(4), 81–86. https://doi.org/10.48001/veethika.1004008

Issue

Section

Articles