Adherence of AS-16 Borrowing Costs by Non- Corporate Entities; A Descendant Note

  • John Britto J Fatima Mata National College (Autonomous), Kollam
  • V Joseph James Fatima Mata National College (Autonomous), Kollam.
  • Sangeetha Vincent Fatima Mata National College (Autonomous), Kollam
Keywords: Borrowing costs, Qualifying Assets, Non-qualifying assets, Substantial period of time

Abstract

All organisations whether profit oriented or not need funds either borrowed or owned for investing in its operating assets on a regular basis. Borrowed funds attracts the periodical interest payments and also includes other costs like discounts, finance charges, ancillary costs etc. Proper accounting of such borrowing cost is equally applicable both for the corporate and non-corporate entities in order to report true and fair state of affairs of the business. In this regard, the Accounting Standard – 16 “Borrowing Costs” specifies the criteria for Recognition and Measurement, Presentation and Disclosure of borrowing costs incurred by an entity on its qualifying assets. How far this Accounting Standard is adhered, particularly by the noncorporate entities is a million-dollar question. The present study intends to analyse the treatment of borrowing costs incurred by the non-corporate entities on the qualifying assets. For a deeper analysis of the issue, an enquiry on 30 non-corporate entities was made and analysed the results thereof. The study revealed some interesting facts regarding the issue. Non adherence of AS - 16 among non-corporate entities is evident from the study.

References

Achalapathi, K. V., & Bhanu Sireesha, P. (2015). Impact of IFRS Adoption on Financial Statements of select Indian Companies. Osmania Journal of International Business Studies, 21–
33.
Aca, Ş., & Celasun, O. (2012). Sovereign debt and corporate borrowing costs in emerging markets. Journal of International Economics, 88(1), 198–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JINTECO.2012.02.009
Ali, M. J., Ahmed, K., & Henry, D. (2012). Disclosure compliance with national accounting standards by listed companies in South Asia. Http:// Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/00014788.200
4.9729963, 34(3), 183–199. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2004.9729963
Arteta, C., & Hale, G. (2008). Sovereign debt crises and credit to the private sector. Journal of International Economics, 74(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JINTECO.2007.05.008
Kohlscheen, E., & O’Connell, S. A. (n.d.). Trade Credit and Sovereign Debt.
Liapis, K. J., & Thalassinos, E. (2013). A comparative analysis for the accounting reporting of “employee benefits” between IFRS and other accounting standards : a case study for the biggest listed entities in Greece. International Journal of Economics & Business Administration, I(1), 2013. https://www.um.edu.mt/library/oar/handle/123456789/30932
Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1995). The Effect of Credit Market Competition on Lending Relationships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 407–443. https://doi. org/10.2307/2118445
Rawat, S. D. (2019). Students’ Guide to Accounting Standards. Taxnman Publications Pvt Ltd.
Sakai, K., Uesugi, I., & Watanabe, T. (2010). Firm age and the evolution of borrowing costs: Evidence from Japanese small firms. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(8), 1970–1981. https://doi.org/10.1016/J. JBANKFIN.2010.01.001
Sandleris, G. (2008). Sovereign defaults: Information, investment and credit. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 267–275. h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 10. 101 6 / J .JINTECO.2008.07.008
Sunder, S. (2002). Regulatory competition among accounting standards within and across international boundaries. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21(3), 219–234. https://doi.
org/10.1016/S0278-4254(02)00050-9
Tawiah Konadu Vincent, & Benjamin Muhaheranwa. (2015). Conservatism analysis on Indian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
Walker, M. (2010). Accounting for varieties of capitalism: The case against a single set of global accounting standards. The British Accounting Review, 42(3), 137–152. https://doi.
org/10.1016/J.BAR.2010.04.003
Published
2021-06-30
Section
Articles