Economic Productivity through Net National Disposable Income

A Study of Consumption Patterns in India

Keywords: Final consumption expenditure, life cycle, hypothesis, consumption function, financial wealth

Abstract

According to the Keynesian consumption function, Consumption expenditure plays a crucial role in determining the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), as evident in the Absolute Income Hypothesis. This concept has subsequently been used in developing the permanent income hypothesis and the life cycle hypothesis. However, when considering the net national disposable income after accounting for factors like net factor income from abroad, taxes, and subsidies, it becomes clear that final consumption expenditure holds a more dominant position. A gap in the existing literature arises from the historical unavailability of data, leading to the use of GDP as a proxy variable instead of net national disposable income when determining the consumption function for India. This research paper aims to address this gap by employing the net national disposable income of the Indian economy to estimate the consumption function for the period between 1994 and 2018. Additionally, it empirically tests the long-term effects of current income and current wealth (defined as past year income minus past year consumption) on consumption within the context of the Indian economy. The empirical findings provide support for a significant positive relationship between consumption and income and wealth. This is further substantiated by the significant values of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) derived from income and wealth during the given time period. The estimated equation aligns with the life cycle hypothesis for the Indian economy, indicating that long-term, steadfast planning is crucial for improving the productive capacity of the economy, reducing poverty, and enhancing employment levels more effectively.

References

Abeysinghe, T., & Choy, K. M. (2004). Wealth and consumption: Empirical evidence from the permanent income hypothesis in Singapore. Journal of Asian Economics, 15(3), 591-605.

Akekere, J., & Yousuo, C. (2012). Private consumption expenditure and GDP in Nigeria: 1981-2010. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9), 152-162.

Andrade, P., & Martins, R. (2005). Is consumption adjusted to permanent income? Evidence for Portugal. Portuguese Economic Journal, 4(3), 189-207.

Attanasio, O., & Weber, G. (1995). Is consumption growth consistent with intertemporal optimization? Evidence from the consumer expenditure survey. Journal of Political Economy, 103(6), 1121-1157.

Blanchard, O., & Perotti, R. (2002). An empirical characterization of the dynamic effects of changes in government spending and taxes on output. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(4), 1329-1368.

Bunting, D. (1989). Consumption and income in the United States since 1929. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 183-190.

Carroll, C. D., & Summers, L. H. (1987). Consumption growth parallels income growth: Some new evidence. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 2, 183-240.

Deaton, A. (1991). Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, 59(5), 1221-1248.

Dhakal, D., Koirala, K. B., & Rana, R. P. (2009). Determinants of consumption behaviour in India: 1973-2006. Indian Economic Review, 44(1), 29-42.

Duesenberry, J. S. (1949). Income, saving, and the theory of consumer behavior. Harvard University Press.

Fatas, A., & Mihov, I. (2001). Government size and automatic stabilizers: International and intranational evidence. Journal of International Economics, 55(1), 3-28.

Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton University Press

Gali, J., Gertler, M., & Lopez-Salido, D. (2005). Robustness of the estimates of the hybrid New Keynesian Phillips curve. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(6), 1107-1118.

Guiso, L., Jappelli, T., & Terlizzese, D. (1996). Income risk, borrowing constraints, and portfolio choice. American Economic Review, 86(1), 158-172.

Gupta, P. K., & Mittal, P. (2022). Fuzzy bundling of corporate governance practices and performance of Indian firms. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 22(2), 257–277.

Gupta, S., & Mittal, P. (2015). Base Erosion and Profit Shifting: The New Framework of International Taxation. Journal of Business Management and Information Systems, 2(2), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.48001/jbmis.2015.0202009

Hall, R. E., & Mishkin, F. S. (1982). The sensitivity of consumption to transitory income: Estimates from panel data on households. Econometrica, 50(2), 461-481.

Haq, M. (2010). Consumption and economic growth: A comparative study of India and China. Journal of International Business and Economy, 11(2), 35-55.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest, and money. Palgrave Macmillan.

Mandal, A., Saxena, A., & Mittal, P. (2022). Financial literacy and digital product use for financial inclusion: A GETU model to develop financial literacy. In 2022 8th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS) (pp. 1614–1619). IEEE.

Mittal, P., Kaur, A., & Gupta, P. (2021). The mediating role of big data to influence practitioners to use forensic accounting for fraud detection. European Journal of Business Science and Technology, 7(1), 47–58.

Modigliani, F. (1949). Fluctuations in the saving-income ratio: A problem in economic forecasting. Studies in Income and Wealth, 9, 331-356.

Ofwona, G. A. (2013). Testing consumption-income relationship in the Keynesian economy: Evidence from Kenya. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(11), 41-50.

Published
2023-07-23
How to Cite
Khari, P. (2023). Economic Productivity through Net National Disposable Income. Journal of Business Management and Information Systems, 10(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.48001/jbmis.2023.1002001
Section
Articles