Impact of Edtech on teachers in Colleges

Venkatasubramanian L; A Naseema

doi:10.48001/jbmis.2024.si1013

Authors

Venkatasubramanian L Department of MBA, Sree Saraswathi Thyagaraja College – School of Management, Palani Road, Pollachi, Tamilnadu https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6396-4534
A Naseema Department of MBA, Sree Saraswathi Thyagaraja College – School of Management, Palani Road, Pollachi, Tamilnadu https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3095-2443

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48001/jbmis.2024.si1013

Keywords:

Edtech, Indian Education sector, Information and Communication Technology, Coursera, NPTEL, Online classrooms., Edtech, Indian education sector, Information and communication technology, NPTEL, Online classrooms

Abstract

The Indian education sector has been subjected to numerous amendments and transformations. After Independence, several initiatives were taken by successive governments to develop our education system, particularly at the college level. Educational policies of developed countries, new technologies and automation also impacted our education system. The concept of “EdTech” is one such remarkable aspect that shows the revolution, being undergone by the Indian Education system. Edtech, or education technology, is the practice of introducing Information and Communication Technology into the classroom to create engaging and inclusive learning experiences. Sessions involving PowerPoint presentations through projectors, online courses which can be attended through tools like Coursera and NPTEL, AI tools, ERP and other computer-aided tools, Internet of Things, preparation of pdf-report and PowerPoint presentations by students and uploading them in applications unique to institutions, the concept of online classrooms, that became popular after the surge of Covid-19, are just a few among the numerous examples of Edtech. A report recently prepared by Team Lease Edtech survey revealed around 79.34 per cent of teachers adapted to EdTech tools by practice, 35.54 per cent of teachers equipped themselves by taking courses provided by institutions, 25.62 per cent learned about the EdTech tools from friends/colleagues/family, and 19.01 per cent equipped themselves by undertaking self-sponsored courses, according to a report by EBEF (East Brunswick Education Foundation), the Indian EdTech industry was valued at US$ 750 million in 2020 and is expected to reach US$ 4 billion by 2025 at a CAGR (Compound Annual Growth Rate) of 39.77%. This research aims to analyse how this concept of EdTech has impacted the teachers in their professional growth, and their suggestions regarding how the EdTech tools can be made user-friendly going further. Research is conducted in Coimbatore district. Research involves questionnaire surveying across some selected colleges in the Coimbatore district.

References

Dr. Gupta, Mitali Sharad and Mr. Warkhedkar, Pratik (2023). A Study on impact of Edtech Companies on Education with special reference to Byjus and Vedantu. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION: RABINDRA BHARATI UNIVERSITY ISSN : 0972-7175

Ajmal, A. (2018). Demand for education technology among learners in India is huge… Key challenge is language (TOI Edit Page). Retrieved from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/toi-edit-page/demand-for-education-technologyamong-learners-in-india-is-huge-key-challenge-is-language/

Goswami C. (2014). Role of technology in Indian education. Retrieved from www.ipedr.com/vol79/ 002-IC4E2014-1-003.pd, doi-DOI: 10.7763/IPEDR. 2014

Johri P, Dr. Misra A. (2017). Technology in K-12 Education : A Boon or Bane Astudy. Journal of Web Development and Web Designing.Volume 2 Issue 2.

Hashim H. (2018). Application of technology in digital era. International Journal of research in counselling and education. Vol 1. No. 2.

Angrist, J., & Lavy, V. (2002). New Evidence on Classroom Computers and Pupil Learning. The Economic Journal, 112 (October), 735-765.

Bebell, D. (2005). Technology Promoting Student Excellence: An Investigation of the First Year of 1:1 Computing in New Hampshire Middle Schools. Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA.

O’Dwyer, L.M., Russell, M., Bebell, D., & Tucker-Seeley, K.R. (2005). Examining the Relationship Between Home and School Computer Use and Students’ English/Language Arts Test Scores. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 3(3). Retrieved from: http://escholarship.bc.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=1053&context=jtla.

Zucker, A. A., McGhee, R., Hall, C.Y., Hersh, L., Keefe, D., Kim, B., et al. (2005). A Study of One-to-One Computer Use in Mathematics and Science Instruction at the Secondary Level in Henrico County Public Schools. Retrieved from http://ubiqcomputing.org/FinalReport.pdf

Whitehead, B.M., Jensen, D.F.N., & Boschee, F. (2003). Planning for Technology: A Guide for School Administrators, Technology Coordinators, and Curriculum Leaders. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press

Bonham W, Beichner R, Titus A ,Martin L .(2000). Educational Research Using Web based Assessment Systems, Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 33.1

Cappel J, Hayen R. ( 2004) . Evaluating ELearning: A Case Study. The Journal of Computer Information Systems. 44(4), 49-57

Douglas D, Vyver G, (2004), Effectiveness of E-Learning Course Materials for Learning Database Management. Journal of Computer Information Systems; 44(4), 41.

Mackay S, Stockport G. (2006). Blended Learning, Classroom and E-Learning . The Business Review, Cambridge. 5(1), 82-89

Mehlenbacher B, Miller C, Covington D, Larsen J. (2000) Active and interactive learning online: A comparison of Web-based and conventional writing classes. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication..43(2), 166

Munro R. (2005). Understanding the Buzz Around E-Learning: "Searching for Faster/Better/Cheaper Learning - Effectiveness of E-Learning Techniques". ASQ World Conference on Quality and Improvement Proceedings. Milwaukee: 59, 131-144.

Neumann P. Risks of e-education Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM. New York: (1998). 41 (10), 136

Nunamaker J, Zhang D, Zhao J, Zhou L. (2004). Can E-Learning Replace Classroom Learning? Association for Computing Machinery. Communications of the ACM. 47(5), 75

Tham C, Werner J (2005) Designing and Evaluating E- learning in Higher Education. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies; 11(2),15-25

Meng Tham C, Werner J. (2005). Designing and Evaluating E-Learning in Higher Education: A Review and Recommendations. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. 11(2), 15- 26

Impact of Edtech on teachers in Colleges

Authors

DOI:

Keywords:

Abstract

References

Downloads

Published

How to Cite

Issue

Section

License

Make a Submission

Keywords

jgate