Post-Implantation Alterations in the Surface Topography of Different Implant Systems – A Cross Sectional Pilot Study

  • Fathima Banu . R Senior Lecturer, Faculty of Dental Sciences, Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research(SRIHER), Porur, Chennai Tamilnadu
  • Devi N
  • Anand Kumar V
  • Padmanabhan T V

Abstract

Background: Micro-surface treatment is claimed to improve cell adhesion and enhance osseointegration. The retainability of the micro-surface treatment post-implantation needs to be assessed. 

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to estimate the post-implantation changes in the surface topography of different implant surfaces created by the subtractive methods.Material and Methods: Twelve patients aged between 22-45 years participated in the study. 3 different implant systems; MTX surface with hydroxyapatite grit blasting, Microgrip with sandblasting and DPS surface with alumina grit blasting were utilized. The test implants were placed with a torque of 35-40 N and retrieved immediately after placement, followed by placement of a larger diameter implant for delayed loading protocol. The surface topography of the retrieved implant surfaces was examined using a scanning electron microscope (SEM)(stereo scan 440) at high magnification (2000 nm).

Results: The post-implantation SEM image exhibited altered surface topography that varied between the different implant surface textures.

Conclusions: The surface topography varied between different implants based on the types of surface treatments. The sandblasting with acid etchin had better retention of surface topography post-implantation when compared to the other surface treatments.Clinical implication: Torquing of an implant affects the surface topography and it varied for different implant surface treatments without affecting the osseointegration. 

Published
2021-06-30
How to Cite
R, F. B. ., N, D., V, A., & V, P. (2021). Post-Implantation Alterations in the Surface Topography of Different Implant Systems – A Cross Sectional Pilot Study. Journal of Clinical Prosthodontics and Implantology, 3(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.55995/j-cpi.2021001
Section
Original Research