Impact factor of British rule in Establishing Madras High Court

Swamynathan B

doi:10.48001/ijhir.2022.08.01.002

Swamynathan B Department of Political Science &Public Administration, Annamalai University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48001/ijhir.2022.08.01.002

Keywords: High Court of Madras, Development, Expansion, Evolution, Queen Patent Rule and British Rule, Establishment

Abstract

This study is aimed at tracing the history, origin, and evolutions of the Chennai High Court. The major purpose of this study is framed to exploring emergence of the India’s judiciary systems which emerged during which period would be analyzed. There were questions at the hearts of the ancient rulers as well as British Governments that political system alone is able to rule the entire country’s political, economical, cultural, educational, social, and agricultural issues and needs were ended at suspicions. Regarding these issues after some year gap rulers itself with common people suggestion and public opinion the judiciary systems were established to stand as a neutral problem resolving and needs arranging mechanisms between governments and its protocols. Because in those time rulers are found with exploitative and corrupted characters their characters created unbelief and ambiguity among the people's hearts regarding how they will rule and treat people in a decent way. This situation of the people is forced them to create certain or some neutral and nonpolitical problem resolving and grievance redressed forum that forum is Judiciary, was created by the people for their safety, welfare, and peaceful life in the society. So, judiciary born to provide safety, security, Right of justice, and yield privileges then give to people when it’s neglected by the government or private.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

) Abraham, Henry J. 1983. "The Judiciary: The Supreme Court in the Governmental Process." Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.

) Agnesto, John. 1986. The Supreme Court and Constitutional Democracy. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India.

) Ahluwalia, Montek S. 1993. "India's Economic Reforms" inaugural address at the Seminar on India's Economic Reforms: Merton College, Oxford.

) Ahluwalia, Montek S. 2002. "Economic Reforms in India Since 1991: Has Gradualism Worked? ." Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16:3, pp. 67-88.

) Ahmad, Shareef. 1992. "Public Policy: As an Instrument of Social Engineering." Lawyer, 23:1, pp.89-96.

) Alexander, Lary ed. 1998. Constitutionalism Philosophical Foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

) Allen, Michael and Brian Thompson eds. 2001. Cases and Materials in Constitutional and Administrative Law. London: Blackstone Press.

) Anderson, Gordon. 2003. "Labour Law in a Globalizing World." The Modem Law Review, 66, pp.640-49.

) Anderson, Gary M. 2001. "The Judiciary," in The Elgar Companion to Public Choice. William F. Shughart and Laura Razzolini eds. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar

) Anderson, Gavin W. 2005. Constitutional Rights after Globalization. Oxford: Hart Publishing. • Andrews, William G. ed. 1968. Constitutions and Constitutionalism. New Delhi: Affiliated East West Press.

) Armour, John and Priya Lele. 2008. "Law, Finance, and Politics: The Case of India." ESRC Centre for Business Research -Working Papers wp361.

) Arya, P.P. and B.B. Tandon. 2003. Economic Reform in India: From First to Second Generation and Beyond. New Delhi: Deep & Deep Publishing House. • Atiyah, P.S. 1980. "Judges and Policy." Israel Law Review, 15:3, pp. 346-71.

) Auerbach, Carl A, Willard Hurst, Lloyd K. Garrison, and Samuel Mermin. 1961. The Legal Process: An Introduction to Decision Making by Judicial, Legislative, Executive and Administrative Agencies. Sanfrancisco: Chandler Publishing.

) Austin, Granville. 2003. Working A Democratic Constitution: A History of the Indian Experience. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

) Austin, Granville. 2004. The Constitution of India the Cornerstone of A Nation. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

) Babu, B. Ramesh. 2004. Glocalization and the Indian Nation State: Jurisdiction and Loyalities in Flux. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers.

) Backhaus, Jurgen G. 2001. "Economic Principles of Constitutions: An Economic Analysis of Constitutional Law." The Independent Institute Working Paper No. 40. • Bailey, K.H. 1931. "The Constitution and Economic Policy." The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 158, pp. 236-42.

) Baird, Vanessa A 2001. "Why the Supreme Court cannot Make Liberal Economic Policy: The Effect of Profit Minded Litigants' Strategies on the Supreme Court's Agenda." 2001 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 18-22.