A comparative study of physical fitness parameters between General college students and Training college students
Keywords:
Agility, balance, muscular strength, physical fitnessAbstract
Physical fitness is a required element for all the activities in our society. Physical fitness of an individual is mainly dependent on lifestyle related factors such as daily physical activity levels. Physical fitness is also considered as the degree of ability to execute a physical task under various ambient conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the comparative analysis of physical fitness components of general and training college students. To obtain data 25 female students age between 18-25 years were selected randomly in each college. Six physical fitness components viz., Explosive strength, Flexibility, Agility, Balance, Muscular strength, Muscular endurance, were considered as variable for the present study. The data were collected by standard tools and techniques. Mean and standard deviation was used as descriptive t-test was used to measure the significance of different between two groups. Result of the present study revealed that among various physical fitness variables explosive strength, flexibility, agility, balance and muscular endurance is better in training college students than the general college students. It is concluded that training college students are significantly more fit than the general college students.
References
Baro, M. and Saikia, P. (2014). Comparative Study of Physical Fitness Between Physical Education Students and Dancers of Performing Art. International Journal of Scientific Research. 3 : 355-356
Barry, L. J. and Jack, K. N. (1988). Practical measurements for evaluation in physical education, U. S. A. Pp. 78, 113, 120, 217- 218, 227.
Das, S. and Bag, A. (2015). Comparative Study on Selected Strength between Non Sports Performer and Sports Performer College Student of Jamboni Block of West Bengal. IOSR Journal of Sports and Physical Education. 2(4): 12-14.
Espenschade, A. S. (1968). Motor Development. In: Science and Medicine of Exercise and Sports. Ed: Warren, R., New York: Harper and Brothers (Cited by Marilyn F. Vincent, Research Quarterly, December, 1968).
Ghai, G. D. and Negi, S. C. (2007). A Comparative Study of Motor Development Patterns of Trained and Untrained Indian Girls. Journal of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy. 3(2): 142-148.
Golding, L. A. (2000). YMCA Fitness Testing and Assessment Manual. 4th ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics. Lee, I. M., Shiroma, E. J., Lobelo, F., Puska, P., Blair, S. N. and Katzmarzyk, P. I. (2012). Effect of physical inactivity on major non communicable diseases worldwide: An analysis of burden of diseases and life expectancy. The Lancet. 380: 219- 229.
Morteza, J., Iraj, S., Ali, O. and Amineh, S. (2011). Comparison of physical fitness level among the students of IAU Shabestar Branch. Scholar Research Library. Pp. 460-467.
Rhodes, R. E. and Smith, N. E. (2006). Personality correlates of physical activity: A review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 40: 958-965.
Rhodes, R. E. and Smith, N. E. (2006). Personality correlates of physical activity: A review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 40: 958-965.
Sanjaya, K. and Awati, A. (2014). A comparative analysis on physical fitness of rural and urban high school students. New man International Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies. 1(4): 122-133.
Singh, H. (1991). Science of Sports Training. New Delhi: D.V.S. Publication. Sermeev, B. V. (1966). Development of Mobility in the Hip Joint in Sportsman. Yessis Review. 2(1): Cited in Science of Stretching.
