The peer reviewers play a key role in the manuscript review process. They are responsible for evaluating a manuscript in their specialty field only. After  a respectful and constructive evaluation of the manuscript, they fill up an honest Reviewer form to the Editor-in-chief, International Journal of Experimental Research and Review (e-ISSN: 2455-4855). The Peer Reviewer noted their details such as quality, completeness, strengths and weaknesses of the manuscript, and the quality of the works.(Note: Executive members have double-checked such similarities with the help of the Journal's Turnitin plagiarism software).

Reviewers assess the quality, completeness, and correctness of research given in article submissions to journals based on the journal's needs, specified criteria, and the quality, completeness, and accuracy of the study presented. They provide input on the work, offer suggestions for improvements, and advise the editor on whether to accept, reject, or seek modifications. Although the editor makes the final judgment, reviewers have an important part in shaping the conclusion (Ref. https://www.elsevier.com/reviewers/role).

Before evaluating the article, the reviewer must be aware of his responsibilities, such as if the review matches the article, whether he has time to evaluate it, and whether there are any possible conflicts of interest.

Reviewers must be aware of content quality and originality, journal format, title, organization, e-mail, keywords, abstract, introduction, methodology, results, discussion, tables, figures, language, and other factors throughout the review process.

Finally, any data, ideas, and other information from the text must be kept private and not used for personal gain in any manner.

Only the online process should be used to fill out the reviewer form. Click here to view the format.