Comparative assessment of foraging strategies in ants: A preliminary experimental study

Authors

  • Pritha Chakraborty Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Anushka Sengupta Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Aditya Mojumder Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Antara Biswas Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Shrayashi Mazumder Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Megha Biswas Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Mousumi Halder Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Sayani Cakraborty Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Srijita Dey Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Asmita Samadder Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India
  • Prantik Ghosh Department of Zoology, Dum Dum Motijheel College, Kolkata-700074, West Bengal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2018.v15.001

Keywords:

Ant, competition, food items, foraging behavior

Abstract

The study of foraging behaviour in ants is a special challenge to entomologists and insect biologist as they usher a lot of distinct phenomenon modulations like food preferences, competition, bait monopolization, memory of trail track, etc. Therefore, in this study a short experimental method was used to check and verify the different types of ants present in the surroundings of the college premises and the type of food these varied types of ants preferred. Further, competitive strategies were also evaluated during the course of the study. Results clearly revealed that five different types of ant species were found of which the most abundant and dominant species being Camponotus compressus followed by Solenopsis geminata, Paratrechina longicornis, Diacamma sculpratum and Tetraponera rufonigra showing strong inter-specific competition. Further, the monopolization of C. compressus was also noted for honey and avoidance for neem extract by all types of ants was addressed in the course of this work. Thus, this preliminary work calls upon further research for evaluating the inter-relationship of genes regulating monopoly and food preferences in foraging ants in future.

References

Li, L., Peng, H., Kurths, J., Yang, Y. and Schellnhuber, H. J. (2014). Chaos–order transition in foraging behavior of ants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 111(23): 8392–8397.

Perna, A., Granovskiy, B., Garnier, S., Nicolis, S. C., Labedan, M., Theraulaz, G., Fourcassie, V. and Sumpter, D. J.T. (2012). Individual Rules for Trail Pattern Formation in Argentine Ants (Linepithema humile). PLOS Computational Biology. 8(7): e1002592.

Sudd, J. H. (1959). Interaction between Ants on a Scent Trail. Nature. 183: 1588.

Tian, L. and Zhou, X. (2014). The Soldiers in Societies: Defence, Regulation and Evolution. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 10(3): 296-308.

Czaczkes, T., Gruter, C., Ellis, L., Wood, E. and Ratnieks, F. L.W. (2013). Ant foraging on complex trails: route learning and the role of trail pheromones in Lasius niger. J. Exp. Biol. 216: 188-197.

Mondal, S., Sardar, A., Roychowdhury, S., Das, S., Das, S., Sardar, P., Satra, S., Sanyal, P., Mahato, M. K., Ghosh, S., Bar, A., Das, R., Dey, S., Ghosh, P., De, S., Chakraborty, M., Sarkar, N. and Samadder, A. (2017). Modulatory role of phyto-products in foraging behaviour of Drosophila sp leading to altered reproductive strategies: a novel experimental approach. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review. 14: 29-33.

Downloads

Published

2018-04-30

How to Cite

Chakraborty, P., Sengupta, A., Mojumder, A., Biswas, A., Mazumder, S., Biswas, M., … Ghosh, P. (2018). Comparative assessment of foraging strategies in ants: A preliminary experimental study. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review, 15, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.52756/ijerr.2018.v15.001

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)