Cluster and principal component analysis for the selection of maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes
Keywords:
Cluster analysis, maize, PCA, selection, yieldAbstract
Breeding for high yield crop requires information on the nature and magnitude of variation in the available materials, relationship of yield with other agronomic characters and the degree of environmental influence on the expression of these components characters. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying better performing maize genotypes and related traits with the help of principal component analysis and cluster analysis of major quantitative traits of the crop. Six genotypes of maize were tested and observed for days to tasseling, days to silking, days to pollen shed anthesis, ear height, silk length, plant height, ear length, ear circumference, number of kernel row per ear, number of kernel per row, five hundred kernel weight and grain yield.The first two components that explained 73.7% of the total variation were determined from Principal component analysis and were used for clustering genotypes. Second cluster comprising of four genotypes namely Rampur Yellow, CP808, Khumal Yellow and Rajkumar, had higher value of traits like number of kernel row per ear, number of kernel per row, and grain yield. The selection from the second cluster can be considered worthwhile as it has genotypes performing better in terms of yield and yield attributing characters and can be used for breeding purpose of hybrids.
References
Atanaw, A., Wali, M. C., Salimath, P. M. and Jagadeesha, R. C. (2006). Combining ability and heterosis for grain yield and ear characters in maize. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 19(1): 3-16.
Bauer, I., MladenovicDrinic, S., Drini?, G., and Ignjatovi?Mici?, D. (2007). Assessing temporal changes in genetic diversity of maize hybrids using RAPD markers. Cereal Research Communications. 35(4): 1563-1571.
Bello, O. B. and Olaoye, G. (2009). Combining ability for maize grain yield and other agronomic characters in a typical southern guinea savanna ecology of Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8 (11): 2518- 2522.
Fakorede, M. A. B. and Opeke, B. O. (1985). Weather factors affecting the response of maize to planting dates in a tropical rainforest location. Experimental Agriculture. 21(01): 31-40.
Kraic, F., Mocák, J., Rohá?ik, T. and Sokolovi?ová, J. (2009). Chemometric characterization and classification of new wheat genotypes. Nova Biotechnol. 9: 101-106.
Muhammad, B. A., Muhammad, R., Muhammad, S. T., Amer, H., Tariq, M. and Muhammad, S. A.(2003). Character association and path coefficient analysis of grain yield and yield Components in maize. Pak. J. Biological Sci. 6 (2): 136- 138.
Pahadi, P. and Sapkota, M. (2016). Variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in Maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in Baitadi, Nepal. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review. 6: 25-34.
Puri, Y. P., Qualset, C. O. and Williams, W. A. (1982). Evaluation of yield components as selection criteria in barley breeding. Crop Sci. 22: 927-931.
Rahim, M. A., Mia, A. A., Mahmud, F., Zeba, N. and Afrin, K. (2010). Genetic variability, character association and genetic divergence in Mungbean (Vignaradiata L. Wilczek). Plant Omic. 3: 1-6.
Singh, S. P. and Diwivedi, V. K. (2005). Genetic divergence in wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). Agricultural Science Digest. 25(3): 201-203.
Wali, M. C., Salimath, P. M., Prashanth, M., and Harlapur, S. I. (2006). Studies on character association as influenced by yield, starch and oil in maize (Zea mays L.). Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science. 19(4): 932-935.
