Variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis in Maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes in Baitadi, Nepal

Pratima Pahadi; Manoj Sapkota

Authors

Pratima Pahadi Gokuleshowar Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Baitadi, Nepal Postal code: 10202, Nepal
Manoj Sapkota Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University, Chitwan, Nepal Postal code: 44209, Nepal

Keywords:

Correlation, maize, Zea mays, path coefficient, variability

Abstract

Six maize genotypes were evaluated in three replicated randomized block from July-October, 2015 to assess the association among yield components, correlation and variability. Days to tasseling (DTT), days to silking (DTS), days to pollen shed anthesis (DTPSA), ear height (EH), ear length (EL), ear circumference (EC), silk length (SL), plant height (PH), number of kernels row per ear (NKRPE) and number of kernels per row (NKPR) and grain yield per plant (GYPP) were recorded. The genotypes significantly differed in all traits except EH and GYPP. EH (0.222), SL (0.189), PH (0.304), EC (0.419), NKRPE (0.310) and NKPR (0.399) had positive correlation with grain yield per plant. Similarly, DTT (-0.185), DTS (-0.324) and EL (-0.150) had negative correlation with GYPP. Path coefficient analysis showed that NKRPE (0.752) had highest positive and direct contribution on GYPP followed by DTT (0.385), PH (0.351), NKPR (0.298), SL (0.071) and EL (0.044). DTS (-1.384) had highest direct negative effect on GYPP followed by EH (-0.393) and EC (-0.136). The phenotypic coefficient of variation was higher than genotypic coefficient of variation for all characters; difference of which was high in SL and EH indicating these traits are affected by environment as well. NKRPE, NKPR, DTT, DTS, PH, SL and EL had highest positive direct contribution on grain yield, which are the pre-requisites for attaining improvement in yield of maize genotypes.

References

Andreas, B., Krajewski, P., Kristensen, K. and Pilarczyk, G. (2007). Trial setup and statistical analysis. Suvar Handbook.
Arshad, M. (1985). Correlation and path coefficient analysis of grain yield with some morphological characters in wheat. M.Sc. Thesis, Deptt. Pl. Br. Genet., Univ. Agric., Faisalabad– Pakistan.
Bekri?, V. and Radosavljevi?, M. (2008).Savremeni prist up iupo trebeku kuruza. PTEP 12:93-96.
Board, J.E., Kang, M.S. andHarville, B.G., (1997). Path analyses identify indirect selection criteria for yield of late-planted soybean. Crop. Sci. 37: 879-884.
Chaudhary, L.B. and Prasad, B. (1968). Genetic variation and heritability of quantitative characters in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea). Indian Journal of Agricultural Science. 38: 820-825.
Farshadfar, E. (2004). Multivariate principles and procedures of statistics. Taghbostan Pub. Kermanshah, Iran. Pp.734. Garcia, Del, Moral, L.F., Rharrabti, Y., Villegas, D. and Royo, C.(2003). Evaluation of Grain Yield and Its Components in Durum Wheat under Mediterranean Conditions. An Ontogenic Approach. Agron. J. 95: 266–274.
Halder, N. C. (2015). Abundance and diversity of unicellular, filamentous cyanobacteria (BGA) and other higher algal genera in different rice fields of North 24 Parganas District in West Bengal, India. International Journal of Experimental Research and Review (IJERR). 1: 17-27.
Hanson, C.H., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1956). Biometrical studies of yield in segregating populations of Korean Lespedeza. Agronomy Journal. 48(6): 268-272.
Johnson, H.W., Robinson, H.F. and Comstock, R.E. (1955). Estimates of genetic and environmental variability in soybeans. Agronomy journal. 47(7): 314-318.
Kang, M.S., Macus, S.Z. and Gary, F.K. (1983). Path coefficient analysis of grain yield and harvest grain moisture in maize. Tropical Agric. (Trinidad). 60:253-256.
Kang, M. and Gorman, D. (1989). Genotype x Environment Interaction in Maize. Agronomy Journal . 81: 662-664. Kumar, V., Singh, P.K. and Guptha, A., (2011). Studies of genetic diversity in quality protein maize (Zea mays L.) inbreds. Curreant Advances in Agricultural Sciences. 3 (2): 96-99.
Milligan, S.B., Gravois, K.A., Bischoff, K.P. and Martin F.A. (1990). Crop effects on genetic relationships among sugarcane traits. Crop Sci. 30: 927- 931.
MoAD (2014). Statistical Information on Nepalese Agriculture 2013/14. Singa Durbar, Kathmandu Nepal: Ministry of Agriculture and Development, Agri-Business Promotion and Statistics Division.
Parimala, K., Raghu, B. and Reddy, A.V. (2011). Correlation and path analysis for yield and quality traits in maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Arch. 11 (2): 1045-1047.
Puri, Y.P., Qualset, C.O. and Williams, W.A. (1982). Evaluation of yield components as selection criteria in barley breeding. Crop Sci. 22: 927- 931.
Robinson, H.F., Comstock, R.E. and Harvey, P.H. (1949). Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn. Agronomy Journal. Pp. 353.
Samonte, O.P.B., Wilson, L.T. and McClung, A.M. (1998). Path analyses of yield and yield related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Sci. 38:1130-1136.
Sivasubramanjan, S., Menon, M.(1973). Heterosis and inbreeding depression in rice. Advances in Agronomy. 47: 85-140.
Williams, W.A., Jones, M.B. and Demment, M.W. (1990). A concise table for path analysis statistics. Agron. J. 82: 1022–1024.